Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing all 2 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Ranko Cesic (“Brcko”)

    Year
    2004
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Sexual Violence against Men/Boys Forced Oral Sex Detention Centers Forced Rape of Family Members

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/678/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Ranko Cesic
    Charges
    - Humiliating and degrading treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (committing) for forcing, at gunpoint, two Muslim brothers detained at Luka camp to perform fellatio on each other in the presence of others on about 11 May 1992.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Cesic entered a guilty plea to all counts in the indictment (on 8 October 2003). Cesic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Humiliating and degrading treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Rape as a crime against humanity
    sentencing
    Cesic was sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment on 11 March 2004.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-10/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    USA Supreme Court - Emmanuel Constant (“Doe v. Constant”)

    Year
    2010
    Issues
    Sentencing and Reparations
    Country
    United States of America
    Keywords
    Forced to watch Rape Forced Rape of Family Members Gang Rape Terrorism

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1116
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    US Supreme Court
    Name of accused
    Emmanuel Constant
    Charges
    Torture, crimes against humanity and the systematic use of violence against women (including rape in 2006) under the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victim Protection Act.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 16 August 2006, the Court found Constant guilty of torture, crimes against humanity and the systematic use of violence against women (including rape in 2006).
    sentencing
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Constant appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On December 1, 2009, the Second Circuit rejected Constant’s appeal and upheld the $19 million judgment against him. Constant filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc by the full Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which was denied on February 23, 2010. Finally, on October 4, 2010 the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order denying Constant’s petition for a writ of certiorari.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    08-4827-cv
    Reparations / awards
    <span style="text-align: justify; line-height: 13.8px;">Constant was ordered to pay $19 million in compensatory and punitive damages to three women who survived the crimes committed under his control.</span>

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).